posted by Nicolette Beard @ 8:00 AM
This is an algorithmic change in Google, looking for higher quality sites to surface for long tail queries. It went through vigorous testing and isn’t going to be rolled back.
Matt Cutts, Principal Engineer, Google
Related Posts:
1.27.2010
posted by Nicolette Beard @ 4:14 PM
As one blogger put it: “Who cares where they rank (sic), if the #1 rank is below the fold?”
With the advent of Universal Search and now Real-Time Search, we can look fondly back to the time when competing for a page one ranking seemed comparatively easy.
Every business is now competing with
- Paid listings
- New product listing ads
- News
- Organic results (1-4)
- Shopping sites via Google Merchant
- Video via YouTube
- Organic results (5-10)
The above list reinforces why it’s so important to know how to promote your site, products and services in all the areas included on a page one result. Traditional search engine optimization (SEO) has morphed into “search optimization.”
Although on-page optimization is still important for effective crawling and indexing of your most important Web pages, it’s no longer enough if you want to be competitive in today’s market.
As Google continues to acquire even more data from mining Social Data Sources, they will be increasing their knowledge about a business ten-fold over the next few years.
This data will eventually be significant in how they rank Web pages not only in Local Search but in Organic Search as well. And we haven’t even factored in Mobile Search.
As detailed in a recent Webinar, the time to develop an holistic engagement strategy is now. Reputation management will be critical to the ongoing survival for any business.
What are the positive online signals your company is sending?
Related Posts:
10.06.2008
posted by Stephen Banks @ 11:20 AM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7417496.stm
This recent article from the BBC has huge implications for web based design, branding and UI. It literally changes everything about what we think about “top down” design.”
Quick quote from the article & renowned usability expert and author Jakob Nielsen:
“In 2004, about 40% of people visited a homepage and then drilled down to where they wanted to go and 60% use a deep link that took them directly to a page or destination inside a site. In 2008, said Dr Nielsen, only 25% of people travel via a homepage. The rest search and get straight there.”
In brief, it says that 75% of visitors to a site don’t come in through the home page. It says users are getting smarter and smarter all the time and they are learning how to use search engines to bypass what they consider “the fluff” and go straight for the “hot potato” – to borrow Jakob’s phrase. How does this impact professional branding & design methodologies? It means we must really consider what is “most” important to the visitors – be they one type or many types. We must look at the usability of the site from many different angles and run test cases of users who enter through a sub page and never see the home page. It means the branding and subsequent design of the site must encompass the “strike team” type of visitor who searches for the exact product or service within a site (within google) hits that page, digests the content and then leaves and never sees another page. This visitor might also turn out to be one of the most important users of a site, by the way: smart, motivated and wanting to make a decision fast based on the information within a site.
If there is business critical branding & marketing intel that only lives on the home page, its time to strongly consider tying into this messaging from other parts of the site. Think of it as advertising other parts of the site within the site. No longer do visitors leisurely stroll through a site, seeing all there is to see. Now they assault it from an oblique angle and deftly evade anything unrelated to their mission.
I know I have been operating this way for years. Rather than go to a company’s home page and click 3-4 links that might reward my time, I simply tab over to that Google search field we all have omnipresent in our browsers and I enter “company.com > product name > release date” and that usually takes me right to the page I want. Ironically, if the parent site doesn’t have this information but a secondary site does, I have no qualms hitting the alternative link for the intel. See what this means? Sites need to be structured smartly, with a focus on information & content for the intended audience. Gone is the scatter shot approach of trying to create one site for everyone. Companies risk losing control of their information to sites that are better focused and structured.
I think it’s very possible to present a strong branding message to these commando types of visitors, you just have to think as smartly as they do.
